Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 15:09:16 PDT, Mark Gaiser escreveu: > On Sun, Apr 16, 2017 at 5:53 PM, Thiago Macieira > > <[email protected]> wrote: > > Em domingo, 16 de abril de 2017, às 08:05:21 PDT, Mark Gaiser escreveu: > >> That again makes me wonder, why did Qt diverge from that? > > > > We didn't diverge. We never had that. The Qt style predates the Standard > > Library having relevance in Qt. When the first QHash-like class was added, > > it was just like that. > > With regards to QHash vs std::unordered_map, yes. > But STL also has std::map which certainly predates Qt and also gives > back an std::pair.
I was referring to std::map and QDict. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
