Em terça-feira, 25 de abril de 2017, às 03:14:54 -03, Marc Mutz escreveu: > On Tuesday 25 April 2017 06:45:04 André Somers wrote: > > Op 24/04/2017 om 20:39 schreef Marc Mutz: > > > On 2017-04-24 20:19, Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > > [...] > > > > > >> What is wrong with QArrayList? > > > > > > Nothing, IMO, in the version proposed by me: > > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/188938 > > > > > > But since there's been no +2 forthcoming on above change, and I will > > > have no part in the massive code duplication that the alternative, > > > making it a class before Qt 6, would entail, I'm considering closing > > > the CR. > > > > Would it not be reasonable to wait until the discussion is finalized? > > Not that I'm a reviewer or an approver, but I would not give a +2 on any > > change that basically fixes a direction if the discussion on that has > > not yet been concluded. > > I believe this is exactly what I'm doing here with this request.
Basically the discussion is: what should happen to QArrayList<int> or QArrayList<void *>? a) fail to compile b) become an array list c) become a vector I point out that (c) is what QList does, and we don't need the same behaviour as QList already has. Marc proposed (a), which is the simplest solution to the problem. I wanted (b), which would require duplication of code and Marc was unwilling to do that. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
