On 04/28/2017 04:05 PM, Edward Welbourne wrote: > On 25 April 2017 at 10:09 I wrote (inter alia): >> [...] the same is relevant for any approver or maintainer: perhaps we >> should tweak our process for introducing candidates for those stations >> within the community; ask that each introduce self in the course of it >> - possibly *after* we've made our decision, so we won't be prejudiced >> by their weird hobbies. ISTR Lars, when proposing me, just linked to >> my review history in gerrit; that probably should suffice for the >> decision on whether to accept a candidate - but it might be worth, >> once the decision is made, as a matter of course, having the new >> approver or maintainer introduce self, or link to web pages that do >> so. > > Just to clarify, as one off-list discussion raised concerns about > pressuring folk to share more than might feel comfortable: I do, of > course, intend no more than that we invite the newly-chosen to say as > much about themselves as they feel comfortable saying. If they wish to > keep their public exposure to what's visible already on gerrit, they are > of course free to do so. > > [...] >> What do folk think ? > > We've heard one +1 and no other public response.
I see one +1 and one -2. Christian _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development