Thiago Macieira wrote: > It's a bug in your testing, because it sets QT_NO_EXCEPTIONS here with Clang.
No it's not, ditto for testing by others. In fact, your test is wrong because it misses a detail: this concerns ObjC++. See http://releases.llvm.org/3.6.0/tools/clang/docs/ReleaseNotes.html#the-exceptions-macro : It explains rather unambiguously that clang 3.6 and later set _EXCEPTIONS `if C++ or ObjC exceptions are enabled` and that `To reliably test if C++ exceptions are enabled, use _EXCEPTIONS && __has_feature(cxx_exceptions), else things won’t work in all versions of Clang in Objective-C++ files.` R _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
