On 7 Jun 2017, at 22:09, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 June 2017 23:57:10 PDT Jani Heikkinen wrote: Hi all, There has been discussion ongoing about 5.10 supported platforms and CI configurations. What we haven't agreed yet is Qt 5.10 pre-built binaries. I don't see big need to change anything from 5.9 but there is still couple of things on my mind: - Should we now switch from MinGW32 bit -> MinGW 64bit ones? With 5.9 this was too early but would it be time to do it now? Offering both isn't an option. And 5,9 is LTS so 5.10 could be good release to change that... - Can we start using RHEL 7.4 for linux packaging? Tony is planning to add RHEL 7.4 in CI and so on it would be wise to replace 7.2 with 7.4 in the packaging as well Is there some other change proposals which we should discuss about? I'd like to propose raising the minimum version for GCC to 4.8.1, which is the first C++11 complete version, or higher. The reason for this is actually to drop GCC 4.7 and earlier, which have a few bugs with their C++11 support. GCC 4.7 has been the minimum since Qt 5.7.0 and is now 5 years old. I'm not necessarily against it, as I believe we need to move forward with our compilers. But I am unsure how much sense this makes as long as we're still supporting VC++ 2013. And dropping GCC 4.7 would imply dropping support for QNX 6. Cheers, Lars I've just been bitten by one with QRandomGenerator, relating to calling static member functions from a lambda. The workaround suggested in the Coding Convention is not applicable going forward because Clang 5.0 will produce a warning about it (I've updated the wiki), so we have to choose which one we'll support very shortly, as soon as Apple begins shipping Clang based on the current trunk version in XCode. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com<http://intel.com/> Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected]<mailto:[email protected]> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
