Hi, to be honest ... I still didn't start full with Qt (only one QtWidget Application).. so I am no expert.
> application and I have not benchmarked it either. I strongly suspect > that the lack of debugger will make adoption of QJSEngine far less > likely for many existing QtScript users other than those who's use cases > are very trivial. NB I also use WebKit and am looking at the QWebEngine but if I understood, with QtScript you can create an application with scripting (macro) support, and even the debugger can be integrated in your application right? So if my customer use scripting in the application he can debug it (so QtScript is what VBA is for Excel). Right? Actually it seems that you can debug something in QtCreator with QML (as Ulf responded) but since in QtCreator the QML designer still ignores the TreeView control (in Qt 5.8 I think it was partialy somewhere but in Qt 5.9/QtCreator 4.3.1 its disappeared). One of my question on the QtCreator blog.qt.io concerning QML was answered but my second post asking about TreeView was not published/deleted... So QML seems for mobile development, and if you want Desktop applications QtWidget seems the reality (or can you immagine a file browser like Windows Explorer without Tree View) .. my thoughts... Qt is nice but some things are not adressed since some Qt versions and talking about seems "forbidden". I don't know if I should give Qt a try for the next project I would really really like, but continuity is important for me and the QtScript and my "small" TreeView critics make me rethink it ... Anton _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
