11.07.2017, 07:52, "Phil Bouchard" <[email protected]>: > On 07/10/2017 05:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do >>> >>> In fact, is it me or it would seem that: >>> - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly >>> - compiling the resulting C++ code >>> >>> Would be a more efficient alternative than all these JIT tools? >> >> No. That would require having a C++ compiler with all the dependent >> libraries >> on every user's device. >> >> You must run the JS as provided and interact with the plugins as they exist >> today. > > Indeed Javascript is not made to run heavy CPU algorithms anyways.
Really? http://browserbench.org/JetStream/ > > On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to > simulate functions that return a function. I know a Javascript to C++ > converter is not what we're looking for but it helps me understand these > cases better. > > -Phil > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Regards, Konstantin _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
