On 2017-07-25 10:10, Grégoire Barbier wrote:
Le 24/07/2017 à 21:44, Henry Skoglund a écrit :
On 2017-07-24 21:32, Grégoire Barbier wrote:
Le 24/07/2017 à 18:45, Henry Skoglund a écrit :
QMap m1 = {std::pair{2,"score"}, {4,"seven"}, {1,"Four"},
{5,"years"}, {3,"and"}, {6,"ago"}};
Or even this:
QMap<int, const char*> m1 { {2, "score"}, {4, "seven"}, };
Yes that works nicely too but it's not bleeding edge/c++17 :-)
This post was just to show that in c++17 it's possible to declare a
QMap without any trailing <> i.e. letting the compiler figure out the
types (less visual clutter) More here:
http://en.cppreference.com/w/cpp/language/class_template_argument_deduction
Rgrds Henry
Sorry I missed your point, by far.
Anyway it's not easy: I played a little bit on godbolt.org and locally
on my computer and it seems that gcc 7.1 only deduces templates
argument with a depth of 1 (never with templates of templates), ICC 17
and MSVC 15.2 being worst on this point (not deducing at all, if I did
not miss something).
Even when addind deduction guides like I tried here:
https://godbolt.org/g/pC8SaV
So, I'll wait and keep my explicit template arguments if needed a few
more years, and keep being thankful to all pioneers like you who use
it now and will make compilers better... :-)
A nested brace initializer does not have a type, if the types used in
the inner braces are distinct, so
std::map m = {{k1, v1}, {k2, v2}};
will not work, even if the compiler implements the DR that you find
referenced from the cppreference link Henry posted. AFAIU, this would
need more language support than what we find in C++17. Ville can
probably tell if there are proposals on the table to enable this.
Thanks,
Marc
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
