On Wed, Sep 06, 2017 at 07:17:02AM +0000, Simon Hausmann wrote: > Applications developed with Qt should be usable by users who do require > assistive technologies and users who don't, out of the box.
Is that meant as a general statement, along the lines of "Applications developed with Qt should be usable by users who do require X" or is that specific to X == "assistive technologies"? I would disagree with both, but for different reasons. > technologies and users who don't, out of the box. That is not opt-in IMO. > It appears that this is feasible on Windows, macOS, iOS and hopefully others, > without compromising significantly on performance or memory consumption. > > If Qt applications on Linux cannot be made to work like that, then it is our > job to fix it on whichever level necessary (system, Qt, etc.) or pay somebody > to fix it. > > If we choose not to fix this, then we are failing at our missing to make life > easier for application developers in this aspect, because at that point it > becomes the developer's job to achieve the same level of quality as Qt offers > on other operating systems, out of the box. We are failing in this respect in a lot of other areas, too, so this hardly can be the only reason. Andre' _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
