On Tuesday, 19 September 2017 03:16:32 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote: > > Why? Is hash randomization really important in your case? > > Actually, you can read value of QT_HASH_SEED from /dev/urandom, restoring > previous behavior exactly.
Read what I wrote in my emails and in the Python bug reports, including Ted Tso's posts: if getrandom() blocked, then reading from /dev/urandom doesn't give you random data. It gives you a predictable sequence. If you know that such a process will start before entropy could be gathered and this process will not have any networking component, then set QT_HASH_SEED to 0 in the environment. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
