> On 13 Oct 2017, at 16:12, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Friday, 13 October 2017 01:30:57 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: >> This sounds like a decent option to me. I'm don't quite like system() and >> global() as names yet, as they don't really make it clear that one of them >> is deterministic. Other than that this looks like a good way forward. > > Well, one of them is deterministic, but only if you know the seed which comes > from the non-deterministic one. So it's highly unlikely that you'll be able > to > determine its sequence.
Of course, but they have different characteristics that the names above don't really reflect. From looking at the names, I doubt most people would guess that one of them can block, while the other doesn't. Cheers, Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
