> We were. I'm asking for a quicker decision now, to decide whether I need to > invest time making QRandomGenerator deterministic mode work on MSVC 2013.
Did you consider having a policy such as "Feature X is only available for compilers that suports Y" ? (to use sparingly, of course) Philippe On Tue, 17 Oct 2017 22:13:19 -0700 Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> wrote: > On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 21:54:40 PDT Ville Voutilainen wrote: > > On 18 October 2017 at 07:51, Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > > > This came up again in QtCS and we decided that dropping it soon is > > > probably a good idea, especially after Qt 5.9 became LTS. > > > > > > Did we decide on 5.10 or 5.11? > > > > > > Because one of my changes for 5.10 is currently failing on MSVC 2013 as > > > designed. I need to refactor it for it to compile there. > > > > > > Do I need to implement it? Or shall we drop that compiler? > > > > Weren't we planning to look at the download stats first? > > We were. I'm asking for a quicker decision now, to decide whether I need to > invest time making QRandomGenerator deterministic mode work on MSVC 2013. > > -- > Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com > Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
