On 07/12/17 16:06, Jason H wrote: > Let me ask this, are the versions maintained separately from Qt? If they are, > then they should bump, but if they aren't you're just wasting effort. It may > be that modules can be maintained separately, but how often is that done? It > seems like even Qt 3D is maintained as a proper Qt module, tied to Qt > releases. If they want to have inter-release bumps 5.10.x would seem to be > the way to go?
I would oppose this idea. There is supposed to be backward and forward compatibility in a patch release. Bumping the imports in a patch release breaks this (you can have code using Qt 5.10.1, importing Qt Quick 5.10, and which doesn't work with Qt 5.10.0). My 2 cents, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (UK) Ltd., a KDAB Group company | Tel: UK +44-1625-809908 KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
