On quarta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2018 03:22:34 PST Benjamin TERRIER wrote:
> > Would've been nice to be told we were applying, so we could contribute to
> > the ideas list.
> 
> That's because according to the Qt Project governance model, if the
> mailing list has never been informed
> that the Qt Project was applying, then the Qt project was not applying.
> So it looks to me that the Qt Company applied for the Qt Project.

Sounds like it.

> Or am I missing something?
> 
> Anyway that's a great idea, and I like the idea of an IncludeOS port of Qt.
> 
> Is there some decisions already made about the licensing of the
> contributions? Like, are contributions going to be released under
> GPL/LGPL/Commercial license like most of Qt,
> or are they going to be GPL/Commercial only?

If they land in the repository, they need to follow the regular licensing. And 
this is GSoC, everything needs to be Open Source.

-- 
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
  Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center



_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to