On quarta-feira, 14 de fevereiro de 2018 03:22:34 PST Benjamin TERRIER wrote: > > Would've been nice to be told we were applying, so we could contribute to > > the ideas list. > > That's because according to the Qt Project governance model, if the > mailing list has never been informed > that the Qt Project was applying, then the Qt project was not applying. > So it looks to me that the Qt Company applied for the Qt Project.
Sounds like it. > Or am I missing something? > > Anyway that's a great idea, and I like the idea of an IncludeOS port of Qt. > > Is there some decisions already made about the licensing of the > contributions? Like, are contributions going to be released under > GPL/LGPL/Commercial license like most of Qt, > or are they going to be GPL/Commercial only? If they land in the repository, they need to follow the regular licensing. And this is GSoC, everything needs to be Open Source. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
