On 04/27/2018 04:18 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote:
Phil Bouchard <[email protected]> wrote:
And I put Qt on top of the list because you already have all the
necessary layers to jump start to the next level.

Phil Bouchard (27 April 2018 00:06)
What I meant by that is Qt could create the ultimate “holodeck” with a
mixture of:
- Virtual reality headsets
- WebAssembly
- Qt / QML supporting 3D effects

Well, those are all, in some sense, on their way.

Nice...

- Some external AI engine

We might just leave the folk with the AI engines to work out how to use
Qt to give them nice UIs.

Definitely.

- Fornux C++ Superset

Nothing as yet persuades me that we need this one.  Of course, once your
compiler can handle Qt's C++ code, you'll be at liberty to combine the
first three above with whatever you like, including your favourite AI
engine.

I'm just trying to help speeding up development here.

I think that’s much better than wasting your time supporting Python or
Javascript that can be easily reverse engineered because of their
interpreted nature.

Your obsession with not being easy to reverse engineer suggests you
don't really understand the nature of Free Software; our source code is
publicly available, so who would need to reverse-engineer it ?
We gladly share it and save them the bother,

I'm referring to Qt's customers who wants to release commercial apps; they won't like to know part of their code can be deciphered. Performance does play a role as well; you don't want to bottleneck the app with any garbage collector at all.


Regards,
-Phil

_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Reply via email to