Hi, Yeah, declarative dev is busted. I’ll look into it on Monday. Meanwhile I support pinning to an older sha1 in qt5.
Simon > On 28. Apr 2018, at 21:51, Liang Qi <[email protected]> wrote: > > 5.11.0 is fine. Latest one is successful, > https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1525572833 > > But looks like there are issues in qt5 dev integration, please check > https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/227670/ and > https://testresults.qt.io/coin/integration/qt/qt5/tasks/1525573813 . > > My proposal is switch qtdeclarative back to > 913dc3f4f2be7c2c23237bcb9bffb3192cb10d60 . The new patch set PS5 is pushed > there, and have a background build(status check) running, looks good by now. > > — Liang > >> On 27 Apr 2018, at 12:28, Tuukka Turunen <[email protected]> wrote: >> >> >> Hi, >> >> So we should probably restart https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/227410/ >> and re-run other qt5.git runs to make sure all tests are properly run in >> those? >> >> Yours, >> >> Tuukka >> >> From: Development <[email protected]> >> on behalf of Sami Nurmenniemi <[email protected]> >> Date: Friday, 27 April 2018 at 13.06 >> To: Simon Hausmann <[email protected]>, "[email protected]" >> <[email protected]> >> Cc: Qt CI <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [Development] CI "wave-through" >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Increasing the "non-zero change" there a bit, the "wave-through window" was >> from "25th of April 15:30 CET" to "27th of April 12:00 CET". >> >> >> >> Best Regards, >> >> Sami >> >> Lähettäjä: Development >> <[email protected]> käyttäjän Simon >> Hausmann <[email protected]> puolesta >> Lähetetty: 27. huhtikuuta 2018 12:54:11 >> Vastaanottaja: [email protected] >> Kopio: Qt CI >> Aihe: [Development] CI "wave-through" >> >> Hi, >> >> >> >> Since yesterday afternoon around 15:30 central european time the CI has >> experienced a "failure" that resulted in each and all tests being skipped. >> So if a change broke the build, the CI would reject it. But if the change >> would normally result in a test failing, then the CI waved the change >> through regardless as it did not run any tests at all (apart from the BIC >> tests). >> >> >> >> The issue has been corrected as of a few minutes ago, but there is a >> non-zero chance that faulty changes may have slipped through and may result >> in test failures that are not related to changes you're trying to integrate. >> >> >> >> >> >> Simon >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development > _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
