> On 1 Jun 2018, at 08:28, Edward Welbourne <[email protected]> wrote: > > Em segunda-feira, 17 de abril de 2017, às 04:24:25 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev > escreveu: >>>> 1. Is it still legal to incorporate "inline functions and templates" >>>> into code not covered by LGPLv3? In particular, I'm interested in >>>> qAsConst > > On 17 Apr 2017, at 18:07, Thiago Macieira <[email protected]> wrote: >>> The LGPLv3 text contains the equivalent exception. See LICENSE.LGPLv3 >>> section 3 "Object Code Incorporating Material from Library Header >>> Files." > > Lars Knoll (18 April 2017 10:38) >> The LGPL_EXCEPTION.txt files should get removed from our >> sources. LGPLv3 covers this case directly. > > Trippng over this in the tail of my in-box the other day, I checked and > found it hadn't happened so, after checking with Lars, got on with it. > The LGPL_EXCEPTION files are now gone (last integrated this morning).
Thanks Eddy! Lars _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
