On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 05:46:44 PDT Simon Hausmann wrote: > I favor (a) along with the existing test, because of the issues Giuseppe > outlined with (b) and I'm sceptical about how realistic (c) is for us.
We will not be able to get (c) working everywhere. I remember trying objcopy some years ago messing with symbol properties and I know I wasn't successful. I don't remember what I was trying, though, so this is not a showstopper for our current problem. Just don't get your hopes up. I think we need (a) and we can apply (c) if possible. > If we wanted to make this test work again (and produce errors with your > logging category examples), then we would need a configuration in the CI > that builds on Linux without ELF visibility. At least that's one of the > ways it could be done with minimal effort. Why can't the test run on .a files? > It however does not protect us from the issue on Windows and macOS, but it > covers the cross-platform code. nm exists on both too. We won't get it on MSVC, though. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
