On Friday, 17 August 2018 08:13:21 PDT Tor Arne Vestbø wrote: > > Now, looking at the code, I don't think it does work. I thought that > > QCborValue::operator[] returned QCborValueRefs, but it doesn't. Adding a > > set of non-const overloads returning QCborValueRef might be the trick. > That would be great to have as part of the API yes
I won't have time to experiment with it before feature freeze. Technically, the API freeze doesn't happen until Beta, so we have a few more weeks, but I wouldn't hold my hopes up that I will have time to trial this. Any chance you can give it a go? Or someone else? > > And it's a trick we can add to QJsonValue too. > > That would be great, but I think it was kind of tricky with the current > design of QJsonValue. Fair enough. My long-term goal is to replace the QJsonDocument internals with QCborContainerPrivate. That way, the conversion from JSON to CBOR is O(1) and the conversion backwards is just a validation. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
