Olivier Goffart wrote:
> (We should probably deprecate QQueue right now and tell people to use
> std::deque)
Please no!
The API is just not comparable: QQueue uses nicer terminology (enqueue,
dequeue, head) and is implicitly shared, and most importantly, is consistent
with the other Qt containers.
It is only one-sided, but often that's all that's needed. But the two-sided
use case (for which plain QList is currently the best fit, it offers all the
operations std::deque does, with similar wording) must not be destroyed
either (as replacing QList with the current QVector would).
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
