Den mån 5 nov. 2018 kl 20:32 skrev Konstantin Shegunov <kshegu...@gmail.com>: > > Hello, > Since we couldn't agree, I'd love to see some more opinions about this one.[1]
I may be missing some detail, but I think what Thiago says makes sense. When children are destroyed, you know you're in the QObject destructor (from QObject::~QObject docs: "Destroys the object, deleting all its child objects."), so you know the object is now a QObject, no longer a QCoreApplication. If you require your QCoreApplication to be alive by the time your child object is destroyed, I think you have to ensure this on your own. Like I said, I may be missing something, but that's what it looks like to me. I can't see why there would be an exception to the object model here. Elvis > > Specifically: > 1) Is parenting to the application object a thing? > 1.a) ... and should it be allowed (i.e. accepting the proposed change)? > 1.b) .. if not allowed, should we put a warning in the documentation that it > is wrong and shouldn't be done at all, or at least that it's discouraged. > > [1] https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71545 > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
