El martes, 13 de noviembre de 2018 23:58:28 -03 Thiago Macieira escribió: > On Tuesday, 13 November 2018 18:43:03 PST Kevin Kofler wrote: [snip] > > I think it would be much safer to just version everything. > > > > Just remember Assistant in Qt 4, where early 4.x releases shipped an > > Assistant that was essentially compatible with the Qt 3 version, but it > > was > > later renamed to assistant_adp (and later dropped from the Qt distribution > > and shipped as an unmaintained separate legacy tarball) and a new > > incompatible Assistant (the QCH one) was introduced. > > Ok, so two categories only: > 1) applications run by the user (in bin, versioned) > 2) applications run only during build (in libexec, unversioned)
I would of course agree here. But so far only three of us participated in this thread, so I would like to ask: a) Is there something else I could do to make this a consensus decision? Or maybe do something to make this the roadmap for Qt 6? b) If at some point we can agree it has been decided, is there any way I could start contributing code in order to achieve this? Maybe I should just wait until the new build system is on stage? something else? Cheers, Lisandro. -- When the winds of change are blowing, some people are building shelters, and others are building windmills. Old Chinese Proverb Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
