Tuukka Turunen (17 January 2019 15:00) > I think best would be to do the API review in codereview tool as > mailing lists are of limited efficiency in this purpose. Based on the > API review we can then decide if the module is ready to be part of Qt > 5.13 as TP or not. For the existing modules we do the API review a bit > later,
As I suspect you're thinking of the API reviews I create in the run-up to a release, I feel obliged to point out these are really API *change* reviews. Without a prior release to compare against, the tool for that doesn't know how to report anything. You need an actual review of the whole API, not just some recent changes to it. > but for the proposed new modules we could well do it already now - if > not recently completed. I don't know of an established process for API review (that reviews the whole of an API, not just what's lately changed). We surely need one (and it might not hurt to do them to old existing APIs, also, from time to time), in particular for use when considering a new module. Eddy. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development