On 16/03/2019 12.13, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > What I meant is this: during phase 5 and 6, are string literals > simply sequences of symbols from a set, or are they already encoded > in some encoding? From my reading, it's the former (the execution > character set is just this -- a set of symbols), and it's only after > phase 6 that those symbols are encoded in sequences of > char/char16_t/... values (depending on the string literal prefix). I would certainly read 5 as *implying* that at the conclusion of that phase, string literals have a definite encoding. *Not* applying that assumption seems to be how we get the broken MSVC behavior of "reinterpreting" a UTF-8 string as CP-1252.
-- Matthew _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
