There are many ways that are much better and do not have the problems static linking involves.
Beste Grüße / Best regards, Alexander Nassian > Am 15.04.2019 um 01:47 schrieb Carlos Enrique Pérez Sánchez > <[email protected]>: > > What do people think about providing official static packages? > > The reason is that the distribution of an application is much easier in a > single executable. For that reasons I've made many static qt builds and it's > always a lot of work to make it running. > I have success in building qt statically for console and widgets > applications, but I have not success on building Qt Quick Controls 2 > applications statically, mainly on Windows, because the graphics effects are > off, no shadows, no layer, no elevation, etc. > > There internet is full of people trying to build Qt statically, because Qt > Docs lacks information about building static packages and there are not > examples of commands to pass to configure. People even migrated to other > frameworks because they like static applications, and in Qt doing that is > always a pain. > > There is a Jira suggestion: > https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-72810 > > Please give an upvote there it if you agree. > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development -- — bitshift dynamics GmbH Neudorfer Str. 1, 79541 Lörrach Registergericht: Amtsgericht Freiburg i. Breisgau, HRB 713747 Geschäftsführer: Alexander Nassian, Markus Pfaffinger http://www.bitshift-dynamics.de <http://www.bitshift-dynamics.de/> Zentrale: +49 762158673 - 0 Fax: +49 7621 58673 - 90 Allgemeine Anfragen: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Technischer Support: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]> Buchhaltung: [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
