> -----Original Message----- > From: Simon Hausmann > Sent: Monday, 29 April 2019 5:58 PM > To: Mitch Curtis <mitch.cur...@qt.io> > Cc: Thiago Macieira <thiago.macie...@intel.com>; development@qt- > project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package > > > The application is perfectly distributable, but the static libraries are tied > to the > exact compiler binary and therefore not so suitable for sending to other > people. So it’s all good :) > > Simon
Ah, thank you for clarifying! > On 29. Apr 2019, at 17:47, Mitch Curtis <mitch.cur...@qt.io> wrote: > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> On Behalf > Of > >> Thiago Macieira > >> Sent: Monday, 29 April 2019 5:18 PM > >> To: development@qt-project.org > >> Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Static Package > >> > >>> On Monday, 29 April 2019 00:27:14 PDT Mitch Curtis wrote: > >>> -static -release -ltcg -opensource -confirm-license -nomake tests > >>> -nomake examples -silent > >> > >> -static -ltcg is most definitely not redistributable. That build is > >> only usable in your exact machine, and only for so long as you don't > >> perform a system update. > > > > That's a pity. It shaved off 8 mb (19%) of my executable's size. > > > > Can you explain why it's not redistributable? I thought the whole point of > link time code generation was for release builds? > > > >> -- > >> Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect > >> - Intel System Software Products > >> > >> > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> Development mailing list > >> Development@qt-project.org > >> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development > > _______________________________________________ > > Development mailing list > > Development@qt-project.org > > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development