+1.

We could have a document (maybe the README) with the list of current 
approvers/maintainers and submit a change request adding a new approver.

And, after testing the new Gerrit, I would love to use Gerrit more for decision 
making. The conversation workflow in Gerrit improved a lot in the new version. 
In the other hand, emails are far from optimal to discuss stuff.



Best regards,

Jesús

________________________________
From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Florian 
Bruhin <m...@the-compiler.org>
Sent: 20 May 2019 10:50
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Proposal: Using Gerrit for new approver proposals?

Hi,

As someone who's following this list but not working at the Qt Company, I find
the stream of "+1" emails when there's a new proposal for approval rights for
someone a bit noisy :)

What about using Gerrit to do so? I'm not sure how the repository would look
(probably just text files with the proposal text)? Then people could +1 that
change instead.

Just my $0.02 - it's not like I'd unsubscribe over this :)

Florian

--
https://www.qutebrowser.org | m...@the-compiler.org (Mail/XMPP)
   GPG: 916E B0C8 FD55 A072 | https://the-compiler.org/pubkey.asc
         I love long mails! | https://email.is-not-s.ms/
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to