On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 02:25, Simon Hausmann <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Am 06.06.19 um 16:17 schrieb Christian Gagneraud: > > On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 02:08, Simon Hausmann <[email protected]> wrote: > >> > >> Am 06.06.19 um 15:52 schrieb Christian Gagneraud: > >>> On Fri, 7 Jun 2019 at 01:35, Bogdan Vatra via Development > >>> <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> Hi, > >>>> > >>>> I won't hold my breath for community support for iOS. iOS is out for so > >>>> many > >>>> years, yet CMake has no support for t. > >>>> > >>>> iOs is not a show stopper if and only you're prepared to drop this > >>>> plaform > >>>> from Qt 6 in case cmake support will be poor or non existing. > >>> IOs, Android (and other upcoming OS [1]) multi-arch builds are IMHO a > >>> hard-requirement. > >>> Since when the build system "candidate" dictates Qt supported platform? > >>> I thought it was supposed to be the other way around. > >>> > >>> And now people are calling for "community" help b/c they realise that > >>> it will take a massive effort to support these requirements. > >> > >> FWIW, I didn't say that without support from the community nothing will > >> happen, which is what you're suggesting. Eventually somebody from the Qt > >> Company is likely going to dig into the particular topic of iOS, for > >> example. If you would like to see something implemented before that > >> point in time, then please join the development effort. We also hang out > >> in #qt-cmake on Freenode, btw. > > That's exactly my point, "you" took the decision before analysing the > > problems, and now you're asking me to join #qt-cmake to make it > > happen!?! Why would i do that? Can't you provide something that works? > > If not, please bail out. > > As you can see from the responses, an analysis on CMake and iOS has been > done, with encouraging results. These results, on conjunction with the
No, an analisys wasn't done *prior*, an analysis of the problems is *currently* being done. That's my feeling right now. None of these was mentioned in your original email. > results in the other platforms/configurations, gave us - some TqTC and > KDAB devs - enough confidence that we think that we can pull it off. I So you're basically saying that you have no real metrics, just gut feeling that it is possibly doable. Please bring facts, not gut feelings. > did not ask you to join to make it happen, please don't put words into > my mouth. I said that if you'd like to see something implemented before > we get to it, then you're invited to join the effort. Stop saying that i put words in your mouth, i'm just reading and interpreting what you're saying. And right now, i've been heavily invited to something that i don't want to join. Period. Please stop making promises based on potential future "community contribution" that you cannot guarantee. We need facts, not promises and futures. Can you multi-arch-build a Qt example/tutorial for Ios/Android right now? Chris. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
