On Tue, 2019-06-11 at 18:30 +0200, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > > Is this intended? Or would it make sense to move the documentation > > to > > QMetaObject? > Well, also Q_OBJECT itself, Q_SIGNALS/Q_SLOTS, etc. appear in > qobjectdefs.h, yet obviously the right place for documented them is > QObject. So I think the other macros just followed suit. Maybe it's > possible to specify that macro for multiple targets, but is it worth > it?
For my use case, I'm wondering if using Q_NAMESPACE with #include <QMetaObject> is officially supported, or if it's an implementation detail that just "happens to work" and could break. What is the officially supported header for Q_NAMESPACE? Kyle _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
