On Tuesday, 13 August 2019 09:43:35 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: > > Because I don't want to see us undermine a nice open source project that > > is > > struggling to find contributors by promoting a worse alternative just > > because it can be sold. > > Poppler is not usable by any of Qt’s commercial customers, and there’s quite > some demand for PDF viewing capabilities.
I understand that. But read again what I said: I don't want us to undermine a good project with a poor alternative just because it can be sold. > I don’t think we should be blocking valid projects/ideas because of that. In > any case, from all I know, PDFium is feature wise competitive. In any case, > the qt-labs module already exists, the question was simply whether we > should merge it into the web engine module for ease of building and start > supporting it. I'm only waiting for someone to post that analysis. Without one, -1. > > Cool. Can you share a bit of the roadmap? What are the features that have > > been implemented, which ones you do plan on adding anyway and which ones > > probably need a customer to get behind and push? > > The code is out there in the qt-labs repo. A quick glance at > https://github.com/qt-labs/qtpdf/tree/dev/src/pdf might give you some idea > of the supported features. I was being lazy and asking for a summary. I don't have time to go inspect the source code. And I did ask for the roadmap, which implies things that *aren't* there. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel System Software Products _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
