I'm not arguing with that logic. What that said, what is the Debian policy with regard to what dev packages should be added/removed to the official distro?
>From what I'm hearing, I gather it's something like "Debian supports end-user commands/services/applications and the support libraries needed to run them, as well as the dev packages needed to that end." On Mon, Dec 2, 2019 at 1:07 PM Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer < [email protected]> wrote: > Hi! > > Being the one who removed the package... > > On Fri, 29 Nov 2019 at 05:22, Paul Knopf <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > Yeah, I understand the reasoning, because of lack of ABI compat with > minor updates/patches, etc. > > ...exactly. Private API is one of the reasons we don't update Qt more > often. > > > However, our proprietary GUI needs it. I'll work on recompiling that > module with private headers and deploy the deb within our own internal > apt-feed. > > Remember that multimedia is under both LGPL-3 and GPL3. Depending on > the usage you give it you might (or not) need a commercial license. > > -- > Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer > http://perezmeyer.com.ar/ > http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/ >
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
