> On 4 Dec 2019, at 13:15, Christoph Feck <[email protected]> wrote: > > On 12/04/19 12:56, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: >> Hi, >> >> QApplication::globalStrut is a property that has outlived its purpose. >> >> IIRC, then I added that in the early Qt 2 days, anticipating that with >> Qt/Embedded we might see our widgets landing on touch screens “any moment >> now”. The idea was to have a global setting that ensured that widgets and >> other interactables (such as menu items, list items, checkbox markers etc) >> are at least x,y pixels large. >> >> Well, the world has moved on, and the value has never been consistely used >> in styles or widgets anyway. > > I am not in the position to object code changes, but the Skulpture widget > style fully respects the globalStrut for all widgets since many years. > > https://kdepepo.wordpress.com/2009/03/12/global-strut-feature/
Hi Christoph, That’s cool! Sadly, many of our widgets (for instance, none of the item views), and none of our quick controls respect the globalStrut property. So if we want to make this a thing, then it requires a fairly significant effort across our widgets (not to speak of testing the outcome). It will probably still be possible to implement a style that expands all things to a configurable size; you don’t need QApplication::globalStrut for that. Application UIs are anyway designed for touch if they are for devices; trying to make desktop UI concepts and widget sets work for touch UIs is fortunately a thing of the past. To support people with neeed for visiual or motoric support features, device platforms have accessibility solutions as well. So, even if it were done more thoroughly, I think a toolkit-specific “strut configuration” is no longer a sensible approach. Cheers, Volker _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
