On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 09:20, Olivier Goffart <[email protected]> wrote: > > Note how our requirement of C++17 does not extend to the Standard Library. > > > > Or we declare that <variant> is required and boot this compiler from the CI > > too. I don't care which is preferred. > > > > Third option is to upgrade the compiler for QNX to a more recent version. Is > > there one that is C++17 Standard Library compliant? I thought QNX was going > > to > > change to libc++ so this shouldn't be a problem. > > > > It would be nice to be able to use the std library if possible. If only for > things like std::optional.
Yeah, or variant, or any, or various type-traits etc. etc. I think we need to stop saying that our C++17 requirement doesn't extend to the standard library, and in quite the opposite manner say that it does. QNX needs to be dropped for the time being from the dev-branch anyway, that's neither surprising nor shocking. We always expected to prune various embedded platforms, and if need be, other platforms from the initial Qt 6 release. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
