> On 3 Feb 2020, at 08:15, Mikhail Svetkin <[email protected]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I would like to make request to move qthttpserver from qt-labs namespace to a > new namespace qt-addons or qt-extensions. > > The main reason is that it is not a research project anymore. I believe that > the module is ready to become a self contained library as part of Qt Project > and a good example of Qt marketplace.
Yes indeed! Thanks for being awesome :) > I also would like to request to have an independent branch policy for the new > repository. It will allow to speed up development of qthttpserver and it will > not slow down Qt6 works. It makes little sense to me to have the same branching policy for every module, irrespective of their maturity, complexity, release practices etc. E.g. new modules might want to start with the cherry-picking model right away, or not have the notion of LTS branches to begin with. OTOH, we should have a consistent place where contributors can see how different modules do things. Do you plan to document your branching policy? Volker _______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
