As far as I know, there are no tasks created so far. I agree that we need to create a separate task, but not until the final decision.
As it was mentioned in this thread, moving Qt smart pointers to Qt5Compat module is not discussed so far. What to do with existing public API that uses smart Qt smart pointers is also a question. The best solution, in this case, would be porting them to standard smart pointers, I think. On 2/13/20 12:08 PM, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: Il 13/02/20 10:57, Vitaly Fanaskov ha scritto: I think that moving Qt smart pointers to Qt5Compat module creates almost no hassle. For Qt users it should be a one line in the terminal to replace includes in their code bases (probably also prepend a namespace to classes' names, but I'm not sure if there is a namespace). In general, I'd say that this is another problem should be addressed separately. Feel free to kick off a new thread. Is there a QTBUG tracking this idea? It's not "so simple" because Qt smart pointers are being used in a couple of public APIs. _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org<mailto:Development@qt-project.org> https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development -- Best Regards, Fanaskov Vitaly Senior Software Engineer The Qt Company
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
