> -----Original Message----- > From: Kai Köhne > Another alternative is to actually use C++ attributes for this: > > [[qt::emit]] somethingChanged();
I think a fallback to somethingChanged() without any annotation is not what we want. We'd miss vital information and reduce readability. Having said that I hate Q_EMIT even more. It just is ugly as hell. Therefore, I am very glad about Kai's suggestion. Personally, I don't think we need an extra namespace after all what are the odds to have a clash here 😉 but.... that's details. Last but not least, I don't see why we'd want to disable all other keywords when only one of them has a clash. If the current macro enforces this then we should differentiate more. Let's not be too hasty when there is no need. -- Alex _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
