Hi, Thanks Arno for stepping up!
+1 from my side for both nominations (Approver and Maintainer). And thanks, Milian, for having created & maintained the module for such a long time 😊 > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- > Von: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> Im Auftrag von > Arno Rehn > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 17. Juni 2020 15:20 > An: Milian Wolff <milian.wo...@kdab.com>; development@qt-project.org; > psykai1...@googlemail.com; frank.meerkoet...@basyskom.com > Betreff: Re: [Development] Stepping down as QtWebChannel maintainer > > [...] > IIRC this is not the first time that Integrity creates trouble for people. > Can we > just drop it for QtWebChannel? Or maybe move QtWebChannel to be an add- > on in Qt6? I think we should indeed just not test Integrity for qtwebchannel: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTQAINFRA-3834 About the status of Qt WebChannel: It's already an add-on in Qt 5. It's currently not planned for the Qt 6.0 release (according to https://wiki.qt.io/Checklist_for_Qt_6.0_inclusion). Anyhow, I think it's a valuable module, so I do personally hope it will be available soon also for Qt 6. Kai _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
