Il giorno ven 24 lug 2020 alle ore 13:18 Stottlemyer, Brett (B.S.) <bstot...@ford.com> ha scritto: > > Hi Thiago, > > On 7/23/20, 4:54 PM, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" > <development-boun...@qt-project.org on behalf of thiago.macie...@intel.com> > wrote: > > If a property is connected to a slot that doesn't support lazy evaluation, > then the entire chain must be re-evaluated as soon as any of the > properties is > marked dirty. QProperty needs to do that on its own.There's no need for > QTimer. > > This is new. Are you positing that this evaluation mode should exist? Or is > it already how the implementation works? > > What determines whether a slot supports lazy evaluation or not? > > Brett > > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development@qt-project.org > https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
How? That said if something like that exists it means that given a chain of QProperties it need just one "immediate" observers to break all the "benefits" of lazy evaluation(given that it causes all the chain to recompute). This obviously is not worse than what we have now but basically makes me think if we really need this or not. -- Filippo Cucchetto _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
