Il 05/03/21 12:08, Tor Arne Vestbø ha scritto:
This seems like a bug though? From an API point of view, I’d expect this simple assignment to JustWorkTM, without requiring syntactic sugar all over the place. Shouldn’t we fix this, so we don’t need (or leave optional) an explicit _qs suffix?
Because of void f(QString); void f(QStringView); f(u"foobar"); // ambiguouscombined with the overarching plan of adding QStringView overloads when possible (that is, in functions where historically we weren't doing so) and never breaking BC/SC.
HTH, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
_______________________________________________ Development mailing list [email protected] https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
