Hello,
I understand that the current QtSVG support is clearly stated to be SVG Tiny
1.2
We have some clients that would like to add some rendering features from the
non Tiny variant.
For example supporting x,y attributes in tspan. This would help fixing the
rendering of the attached SVG (compare inkscape where it's vertical text vs
QtSVG where it's not).
Implementing support for this doesn't seem like it should be "super hard"
(famous last words) and would help rendering some SVG files that are out there
in the wild.
I know this would be confusing as to being able to document exactly what QtSVG
supports, but it seems to me that if we allow bit by bit small improvements we
could eventually end up with more of the SVG specification supported, since it
seems unlikely that someone will have the time to work on a "mega merge
request" which implements all of the specification.
What do you think?
Should we allow some small features outside of the declared SVG Tiny 1.2
support?
Best Regards,
Albert
--
Albert Astals Cid | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer
Klarälvdalens Datakonsult AB, a KDAB Group company
Tel: Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090, USA +1-866-777-KDAB(5322)
KDAB - The Qt, C++ and OpenGL Experts
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
