Hi all, QML API review documents uploaded now, thanks to Max: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/topic:%22api-change-review-6.3%22+(status:open%20OR%20status:merged)
br, Jani ________________________________________ From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io> Sent: Tuesday, February 1, 2022 4:47 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: call for Qt 6.3 API review Hi, There were still several modules unreviewed, and quite some with issues found (there are a few more now) which appear unfixed (link in the review to the fix, please). Since the hit rate was so high, I also went through the already-appoved ones, and bingo, found the addition of a virtual function, approved now for the second time (first when merged, now in review). Please restrain from giving a +2 on the API reviews if you have not read and understood https://community.kde.org/Policies/Binary_Compatibility_Issues_With_C%2B%2B#The_Do.27s_and_Don.27ts first. I sure hope we didn't miss something like that in 6.2's review (and if we did, we now know how our users value the BC guarantee :) Thanks, Marc ________________________________ From: Development <development-boun...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Jani Heikkinen <jani.heikki...@qt.io> Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2022 12:13 PM To: development@qt-project.org <development@qt-project.org> Subject: [Development] HEADS-UP: call for Qt 6.3 API review Hi all, It is time to do a API review for Qt 6.3 now. Diffs are here: https://codereview.qt-project.org/q/topic:%226.3+API+Review%22 Please do the review asap; we need to compete it as soon as possible. Follow-up task in Jira: https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-99883 br, Jani _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
