> On 18 May 2022, at 11:23, André Somers <an...@familiesomers.nl> wrote: > > > On 18-05-2022 11:19, André Somers wrote: >> >> On 18-05-2022 10:53, Samuel Gaist via Development wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> +1 >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Samuel >> >> As I understand it [1], this needs a formal vote. However, the QUIP does not >> specify a full procedure. I would suggest: >> > And then I forget the actual link: > > https://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0002.html#how-to-become-chief-maintainer
Thanks André. The QUIP asks for a simple-majority vote of all Maintainers. Either way, let’s see what other nominations we get. May I propose that until end of Wednesday 25th, Maintainers can nominate other candidates (including themselves), and then we can have a vote amongst those candidates nominated (the simple majority is enough as per QUIP). The QUIP doesn’t explicitly require the candidate to be a Maintainer. If we have only one candidate by end of Wednesday, then we can use lazy consensus, i.e. as long as none of the maintainers object to the candidate, that candidate becomes chief maintainer. Although I’d expect that whoever has an objection to one candidate also nominates another candidate. Volker _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
