On Wednesday, 3 August 2022 08:52:09 PDT Marius Kittler wrote: > Actually it is not very exciting to see these screenshots because it looks > just like on x86_64 :-)
That's a *good* thing. If they looked different, that would point to a bug -- usually endianness issues. > I suppose that the Qt project does not provide a CI for those archs is not > generally a problem. Distributors like (open)SUSE nevertheless make it work > and also invest their own effort into testing. Thank you, it's appreciated. I expect IBM/Red Hat would also be interested in POWER and S/390, for some reason... Like I said in my email, we don't have the resources or knowledge to fix architectural-specific issues in those platforms, much less apply performance improvements. But we will accept patches in case we break anything. -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Cloud Software Architect - Intel DCAI Cloud Engineering _______________________________________________ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development