samuel ammonius wrote:
> Would wrapping the functions make the feature too large to be approved for
> Qt?
I do not see why you want this to be "approved for Qt" to begin with. I
think it is much more practical to keep the C bindings separate, just as all
the other language bindings out there.
Especially if you are going to write or automatically generate wrapper
functions anyway, as opposed to the non-portable PMF hack you proposed.
Kevin Kofler
_______________________________________________
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
