On 04.02.25 16:25, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development wrote: > On 04/02/2025 14:16, Volker Hilsheimer wrote: >>> Well, the tool itself is built just fine; it's binary identical to >>> one built without Coverity. It's more likely that Coverity is doing >>> something like tracing it during the build process and something goes >>> wrong there, so host tools aren't going to make a difference I'm >>> afraid :( >>> >> Thanks for looking after this Peppe, looks like things are working >> again? At least I got a few reports from Coverity Scan in the last days. > > As I said, I'm skipping qtdeclarative and its dependencies. Not ideal > but better than nothing. :(
Looks like it stopped working again? The last scan is from eight days ago? -- Marc Mutz <marc.m...@qt.io> (he/his) Principal Software Engineer The Qt Company Erich-Thilo-Str. 10 12489 Berlin, Germany www.qt.io Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Jouni Lintunen Sitz der Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg, HRB 144331 B -- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
