Il 13/08/25 11:40, Tor Arne Vestbø ha scritto:
On 13 Aug 2025, at 11:30, Giuseppe D'Angelo via Development<development@qt-project.org> wrote:More on topic: if ultimately it is platform specific whether show() alone is sufficient or one needs show()+requestAcivate() (+ QVERIFY), couldn't this combination be packaged in some QtTest helper function, so that people can simply call that function and it'll always do the rightYes. Though we should stive to use it only when the test actually requires focus. Running tests locally with windows that steal focus unnecessarily is a bit annoying. Of course these things are typically cargo-culled, which is how we probably ended up with the current state of every test requesting activation explicitly after show.
A packaged function would actually allow for an easier way out of the cargo cult, as one could centrally switch its implementation from show()+requestActivate() to show() alone and start monitor exactly what breaks after that, then investigate why.
My 2 c, -- Giuseppe D'Angelo | giuseppe.dang...@kdab.com | Senior Software Engineer KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence
smime.p7s
Description: Firma crittografica S/MIME
-- Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development
