Hi,

I see more and more patches in Qt being written with the assistance of AI tools. (For the sake of brevity, I'm putting everything under the same umbrella, from "LLM improved the English spelling in my commit message" to "this 10'000-lines patch is 100% AI product I didn't even review it")

Do we have a policy in that regard? Especially one for external contributors, who are supposed to honor the CLA, which (amongst other things) implies things like:

Licensor represents and warrants that it or its Affiliate is the owner of the 
Licensor Contribution(s) and that it
or its Affiliate(s) has the authority to grant the licenses thereto set forth 
in Sections 3.1 and 3.2 of this
Agreement.

which is pretty much a gray area right now. (The CLA is under UK law.)

I guess that, since such patches have landed, we generally accept AI-generated contributions? Can we have a formal statement in that regard?


Thanks,
--
Giuseppe D'Angelo | [email protected] | Senior Software Engineer
KDAB (France) S.A.S., a KDAB Group company
Tel. France +33 (0)4 90 84 08 53, http://www.kdab.com
KDAB - Trusted Software Excellence

Attachment: smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature

-- 
Development mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.qt-project.org/listinfo/development

Reply via email to