That's what I expected. Afaik there is a class 1 which allows not a single dead pixel, too - but it should be hard to get and expensive I guess. Well, 2 pixels of 300.000 is OK imho and I simply was not as lucky as you. :) Thanks for the info and let's hope that I will stay the only one with a dead pixel.
2007/10/14, Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 10:50:06PM +0800, Harald Welte wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 01, 2007 at 01:30:42PM +0200, Thomas Gstädtner wrote: > > > > > There's only one thing I don't like: I have a dead pixel (or 2 dead > > > subpixels) :( > > > Its light, green and it sucks on dark backgrounds. But well, it's only > 1 of > > > 300,000 pixels and hardly to see on lighter or coloured bachgrounds, > so I > > > can live with it. > > > Anyone else with dead pixels or am I the only one? > > > > I have not seen any unit with dead pixels so far. > > I've apparently just been lucky [or blind]. > > According to the quality specification, the display can have up to two > pixels defective like you have described and still be within spec. > > Sorry about that. But I guess that's just industry standard, and since > we have four times the pixels of most 2.8" displays, the probability of > bad ones is higher, too :( > > Cheers, > -- > - Harald Welte <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > http://openmoko.org/ > > ============================================================================ > Software for the world's first truly open Free Software mobile phone >
