I have a Motorola A780 mobile, and the charger that comes with it has a
mini-USB connector, and it charges the Neo1973 very good for me. It also
handles a 500mA load.
As far as I know, Motorola has a number of mobiles that uses a mini-USB
connector, so I guess it should be possible to get such a charger
without too much trouble.
I don't know about a car charger (I have dis-selected having a car :-)
so I can't advice you about that.
Peter
Ralf Krantz wrote:
I am using my Neo (latest Qtopia image) since about 10 days as my
primary business phone. I am a quality engineer of automobile industry
and the main problems I have before deeper testing, is that the Neo
will not establish a bluetooth connection with the handsfree system of
common automobile bluetooth units (OEM). Further more I haven't found
a seperate charger for the Neo. I charge it at home with my
Linux-machine and during work the battery get's flat after about 4
hours using it. My windows-business-machine won't load the battery,
which means I have to wait until the next day. Is there somebody out
there, who can give me an advice which wall-plug-charger I have to buy
and secondly which car-charger I have to buy?
Kind Regards
Ralf
Am Mittwoch, den 20.02.2008, 19:48 +0100 schrieb Tilman Baumann:
Joe Pfeiffer wrote:
> Tilman Baumann writes:
>> Hm. I never tried Windows. But this does not make much sense to me.
>> The Os just has to select a device configuration to allow it to draw
>> power. This does not mean it has to have a driver for it.
>> I'm pretty much sure my linux server which i sometimes use for charging
>> does not have any driver whatsoever for this device. But it charges nicely.
>>
>> Strange. But however, it is windows...
>
> I don't know anything about Windows, but -- the problem with not
> charging on dumb cords is that the NEO is polite about needing to
> handshake, and being able to request 500mA, before it will draw
> 500mA. If the device on the other end doesn't even do that, the NEO
> will only draw 100mA which isn't enough (the fast_cccv parameter
> somebody else mentioned will, apparently, force it to draw lots of
> power anyway).
I know. But selecting a device configuration (allowing the device to go
into a status that consumes more than 10mA) has nothing to do with
drivers or anything like that.
At least not necessarily.
Any USB device just offers the host one or many possible device
configurations (descriptors) with they respective power consumtion
profiles when it is plugged in.
The next step for the host (operating system) is to select one of these
configurations to allow the device to go in this mode.
The os does not need to now what a device does, in order to allow it to
do anything.
I'm really surprised and not entirely convinced that windows does not
select a profile on any unknown device.
A mobile phone would be not the only situation where this behaviour
seems like a bad idea.
Regards
Tilman
