All, Thanks a lot. I also saw a few interesting results at yesterday's very good WordPress Mobile Plugin talk I gave during the WP CPH MeetUp.
Windows Desktop is only recognized on Chrome, all other browsers still show some strange blank page, I remember from the OpenDDR heritage. Unless it is a browser issue we simply have to accept (and recommend people use a "proper" browser like Chrome or maybe Safari[?]) Windows Phone, yes, one guy in the group even had a Windows Surface device[?] shows a proper User Agent signature, but currently DeviceMap has no information in its repository for these devices (well, not sure, how many people really need it, but for completeness it would be nice) My own Android tablet, a Samsung Galaxy 10.1N, recently upgraded to Android 4.0.4 shows the screen resolution as 1000something height and 800 width. That's Portrait it seems. I believe it was the same on another attendees iPad we also tried (great device variation I mentioned[?]) Is that what the User Agent provides us by default or what's stored in the DDR, or should the browser notice, if the device is held Portrait or Landscape? (in which case I'd expect width to be 1000+ and height 800, not the opposite) There could be a similar session tomorrow about Django Mobile (Python) but the organizer isn't sure about turnout, and if it's happening. Cheers, Werner On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 12:50 PM, eberhard speer jr. <[email protected]>wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > Guys, > > I updated the .Net code to reflect the changes Reza made and I'm about > to set up the large test code. > > I agree with the idea that regex should be avoided if possible... > Once the test setup is finished we can try variations : white-spaces > and "symbols" but somehow I fear there's always going to be > 'exceptions' and somehow I 'fear' we'll be back to dClass "exotics" ;-) > > Anyway, let's 1st set up the test-stuff and then we have a clearer > idea of what we are talking about and we have a means of testing our > theories etc > > With regard to loading the resources, yes I also agree, that things > should be simple 'drop in' with minimal configuration etc, but for now > I think we should be concentrating on the classifying/matching issue. > > Expect the test results later today... > > esjr > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v1.4.8 (MingW32) > Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/ > > iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRyXYRAAoJEOxywXcFLKYcHw8H/3wwiw/4+7F/3TQh3kEbkQ8i > 9fPywxqs55XxaDS8qSmpjlBusBcfblruyrpp9K/bBSB861aJiw4hv0rA8Ce9tNh8 > 5NpMV+z6oga5bOMfC1PYbYTowRzne4NeJ0phvYRADdrelmvPPsVsA/TdeEs3Tdnj > 7WOpTlkQtCLw0ibzzFCFVoLr5xZmsp2S+bL2HSpPMoqGnSjexJqs8mFgFXBoyxdL > Qki2egorBWKi2NnYbxzbgJ84KmJM1NcSLgvo+fLa9hDNxe1WAbnXhTVLgeWAunKR > U2k/C3qDuVtj8dIzPkzWPvYIYdBLTEOwgC4s4Q74eGrORy58PSsXYLmkvSqyLXY= > =BC+A > -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- >
